It's quite interesting to see that the CRU inquiry (being paid for by UEA - this surprised me, for some reason) is addressing both how the hacking took place, and the issue of the contents. This is odd because they're two entirely different issues. Both deserve investigations, no doubt, it just seems odd they're done together.
That said, the panel seems absolutely Kosher. They have a professor of Geo-Science next to BP's top UK Science guy, as well as the vice president for the Chartered Institute for IT and the rest seem to be politicians/civil servants, so it seems like the truth might actually be the intended outcome, rather than one side or the other. I await their hearing with baited breath...
No comments:
Post a Comment